Social Media During Divorce in Nevada: What You Should—and Shouldn’t—Post

Our Family Matters Podcast — Episode 1

By Keith Pickard and Jordan Garcia, Attorneys and Partners at Nevada Family Law Group

Social media can create real problems during a divorce or child custody case.

A post that seemed harmless when you published it can look very different when it is printed, placed in front of a judge, and presented without the context you thought was obvious. Comments about your former spouse, photos from a party, arguments online, and even posts made by friends or family can potentially become part of a family law dispute.

In the first episode of Our Family Matters, Nevada family law attorneys Keith Pickard and Jordan Garcia discuss how social media can affect divorce and custody cases and what people should consider before posting while litigation is pending.

The simplest rule?

Before you post anything, consider how it would look if the other side displayed it in court.

Key Takeaways

  • Social media posts can potentially become evidence in divorce and child custody litigation.

  • A post does not always communicate the context you intended.

  • Negative comments about a co-parent can create unnecessary problems, particularly when children may see them.

  • Photos involving alcohol, parties, children, relationships, or other sensitive subjects can be interpreted differently during litigation.

  • Posts by relatives, friends, or a new significant other can sometimes complicate matters too.

  • If something online could become an issue in your case, tell your attorney before they discover it in the courtroom.

  • If you choose to use social media during litigation, thoughtful and truthful communication is generally safer than public conflict.

Watch: Social Media and Divorce — The Dos and Don’ts

In Episode 1 of Our Family Matters, Keith Pickard and Jordan Garcia discuss what they have seen happen when social media and family court collide.

Prefer to listen? Hear it on Spotify.


Can Social Media Be Used Against You in a Divorce?

Potentially, yes.

One of the recurring points Keith and Jordan make in the episode is that people often treat social media differently from other written communication. People say things impulsively, joke with friends, vent about their former spouse, or post photos without considering how those posts may appear later.

Keith compares the warning he gives clients to a Miranda warning:

“Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law.”

That does not mean every social media post automatically becomes admissible evidence or determines the outcome of a case. But information published online can become relevant to disputed issues and may be presented as evidence depending on the circumstances.

Keith describes a recent case in which something his client posted online became “Exhibit #1” in the other party's motion.

The larger point is simple: once litigation begins, your audience is no longer necessarily just your friends and followers.

Your former spouse, their attorney, and potentially the court may eventually see what you post.

What About My First Amendment Rights?

You still have them.

Jordan describes clients who have responded to concerns about their social media activity by saying that they have a First Amendment right to say what they want.

His response is essentially: you may have the right to say it, but that does not mean saying it cannot have consequences in your case.

Having the legal ability to post something and deciding that posting it is a good idea are two different questions.

Divorce and custody litigation can place ordinary behavior under considerably more scrutiny than it would receive in everyday life.

How Can Social Media Affect a Child Custody Case?

Social media itself is not a separate Nevada child custody factor. However, what someone posts may become relevant to issues that courts do consider when evaluating a child's best interests.

That can include the level of conflict between parents, their ability to cooperate regarding the child's needs, and whether a parent supports the child's continuing relationship with the other parent.

This is one reason Keith and Jordan repeatedly caution against publicly attacking a co-parent.

A frustrated post about your former spouse may feel like venting to adults. But if the child can see it—or if it reflects ongoing hostility between the parents—it may take on a very different significance during a custody dispute.

Keith gives a straightforward example in the episode: publicly calling the other parent names can create an uncomfortable question in court when the child has access to the same social media platforms.

The safest audience to imagine when posting during a custody case may not be your Facebook friends.

Imagine the judge reading it.

Context Matters—and Social Media Is Bad at Context

One of the strongest themes in the episode is what Jordan describes as the “optics” of a post.

Consider a photo taken at a party.

You may know that the drink in your hand contains no alcohol. You may know that your children were completely safe. You may know what happened immediately before and after the photo.

A judge looking at a screenshot does not necessarily have any of that context.

They see the photograph.

Keith and Jordan discuss how a picture containing what appears to be alcohol, a party environment, or other circumstances that can be interpreted negatively may create questions that would never have existed if the photograph had not been posted.

That does not mean a photograph proves misconduct.

It means you may now have to spend time explaining something that never needed to become an issue.

That is an important distinction.

An Innocent Post Can Look Different During Litigation

Jordan describes another situation involving a completely innocent family moment that became contentious because of the context of the custody dispute.

Outside litigation, the photo probably would have appeared harmless.

Inside a contested family law case, the other parent interpreted the same situation very differently and attempted to turn it into a larger issue.

That example illustrates one of the most useful lessons from the episode:

Do not evaluate a post only by what you know it means. Consider how someone who disagrees with you could characterize it.

That doesn't mean you should live in fear of social media.

It means that during active litigation, a little restraint can prevent unnecessary disputes.

Should You Post About Your Ex During a Divorce?

Generally, turning social media into a battlefield rarely helps.

Keith and Jordan discuss seeing posts containing insults, accusations, sarcastic comments, jokes, and other attacks directed toward the other parent.

Those comments can create multiple problems.

They may intensify conflict between the parties. Children may eventually see them. Friends or relatives may become involved. And the statements may later be shown to the court.

Even a joke can land differently when removed from its original context.

Keith describes a case involving a post a parent apparently thought was funny.

The judge did not.

That is the audience problem again.

The person who matters most in a contested case may interpret your joke very differently from the people who follow you online.

Can Positive Social Media Posts Help?

Keith and Jordan also discuss the opposite situation.

They have seen supportive comments about a co-parent used to demonstrate that a parent is encouraging the child's relationship with the other parent.

For example, congratulating the other parent on an activity with the child or showing genuine support for the child's relationship with both parents can communicate something very different from constant criticism and hostility.

That does not mean you should manufacture flattering posts because you think they will look good in court.

Social media should not become a staged litigation strategy.

The practical takeaway from the episode is simpler:

If you are going to say something publicly, positivity is usually better than hostility.

And sometimes the best post is no post at all.

Your Friends and Family Can Create Problems Too

Your own account is not the only one worth thinking about.

Keith and Jordan discuss situations involving posts and comments from relatives, friends, and significant others.

Imagine that you avoid publicly criticizing your former spouse, but a family member repeatedly attacks them in comments underneath your posts.

That can still create unnecessary questions.

In one example discussed during the episode, a relative posted something negative about the other parent. The client immediately responded and told the relative not to talk about the co-parent that way.

According to Keith and Jordan, that response mattered because it demonstrated that the parent was actively trying to stop the behavior rather than encouraging it.

You cannot control everything another adult says online.

You can control whether you participate in it, encourage it, or make reasonable efforts to shut it down.

What If My Social Media Account Is Private?

Privacy settings can reduce who has direct access to your posts, particularly when children are involved.

But “private” should not be confused with “guaranteed to stay private.”

Other people may still see your content. Friends or relatives may discuss it. Screenshots may exist. Someone else may post photos involving you or your children.

Keith and Jordan's broader recommendation is not to rely on privacy settings as permission to post something you would otherwise be uncomfortable having discussed in your case.

What Should I Do If I've Already Posted Something That Could Be a Problem?

Tell your attorney.

One of the worst scenarios Keith and Jordan describe is being surprised by their own client's social media during a hearing.

If opposing counsel presents a screenshot your attorney has never seen before, there may be very little time to understand the context or determine how best to respond.

Do not assume something is harmless simply because you meant it to be harmless.

If you are concerned that a post, message, photograph, comment, or other online activity could affect your case, discuss it with your attorney.

And before deleting, changing, or otherwise trying to “fix” potentially relevant information, ask your attorney what you should do.

Social Media Dos and Don'ts During Divorce

Do:

  • Think before posting.
    Ask how the post could look without the context you have in your head.

  • Keep conflict offline.
    Social media is rarely the right place to resolve problems with a spouse or co-parent.

  • Remember that children may eventually see your posts.
    Even if they do not follow you today, online content has a way of traveling.

  • Pay attention to what others post involving you or your children.
    Your account is not the only source of online content.

  • Tell your attorney about potential problems.
    Surprises are usually harder to address than issues your attorney knows about beforehand.

Don’t:

  • Use social media to attack your spouse or co-parent.

  • Post impulsively because you're angry.

  • Assume a joke will be interpreted the way you intended.

  • Assume photos explain themselves.

  • Encourage friends or relatives to publicly attack the other parent.

  • Assume a private account means your posts can never become part of the dispute.

The Bottom Line

Social media probably will not decide your Nevada divorce or custody case by itself.

But it can create evidence, generate conflict, raise questions, and force you and your attorney to explain issues that might never have existed otherwise.

As Keith explains in the episode, family court can place parts of your life “under the microscope.” Judges have limited information about what happens inside a family, so the information placed before them can take on greater importance than you expected.

Before publishing something during a divorce or custody dispute, consider one question:

Would I still post this if I knew it might eventually be shown to the judge?

If the answer is no, reconsider posting it.

Episode Chapters

00:00 — Introduction: Social media and divorce
00:36 — Why attorneys warn clients about social media
01:18 — When a social media post becomes evidence
01:47 — First Amendment rights vs. courtroom consequences
02:10 — Posting children and protecting privacy
03:24 — Negative comments and positive co-parenting
04:06 — How an innocent party photo can be misinterpreted
05:49 — Posts from friends and family members
06:19 — When an innocent family photo becomes a custody issue
08:37 — Using social media posts in court
09:18 — Why attacking your ex online can backfire
10:02 — Positive co-parenting online
11:36 — Managing comments from friends, family, and significant others
13:56 — Judges, perception, and the “courtroom microscope”
14:16 — What to do when problematic content exists
16:06 — Why putting arguments in writing matters
16:54 — Final advice and when to speak with an attorney

Frequently Asked Questions About Social Media and Divorce

Can social media posts be used in a Nevada divorce?

Social media content may potentially be used during divorce or custody litigation depending on the content, its relevance, how it is presented, and the circumstances of the case. A post does not automatically determine the outcome of a case simply because it exists.

Should I delete social media during a divorce?

Do not make assumptions about what should be deleted or preserved once litigation is underway. If you have existing posts you are concerned about, speak with your attorney before changing or deleting potentially relevant material.

Can posts about my ex affect child custody?

They potentially can. Public hostility toward a co-parent may become relevant when it relates to issues being disputed in a custody case, particularly when children could be exposed to the conflict.

Can posts from my family or friends affect my case?

They can create issues even when you did not personally write them. You cannot control everything another person posts, but how you respond to inappropriate comments may matter.

Is a private social media account safe during divorce?

Privacy settings can restrict access but cannot guarantee that information will never be shared, screenshotted, discussed, or otherwise become known during litigation.

Should I stop using social media completely?

There is no universal answer for every case. The safer approach is to discuss your specific situation with your attorney and be especially cautious about anything involving your spouse, co-parent, children, finances, relationships, travel, alcohol, or the pending case.

Talk With a Nevada Family Law Attorney

General information can help you understand potential issues, but divorce and child custody cases are highly fact-specific.

If you are going through a divorce or custody dispute and are concerned about social media—or any other issue affecting your case—the attorneys at Nevada Family Law Group can help you understand your options.

Nevada Family Law Group offers a free initial consultation.

Contact Us Today

About the Attorneys

Keith Pickard and Jordan Garcia are attorneys and partners at Nevada Family Law Group. On the Our Family Matters podcast, they discuss Nevada divorce, child custody, and other family law issues using practical insight from their experience representing clients in family court.


This article is provided for general informational purposes only and is not legal advice. All legal matters depend on the specific facts and circumstances involved. Consult an attorney to determine which state, federal, and international laws apply to your case. Reading this article or watching the podcast does not create an attorney-client relationship.

 

Full Episode Transcript

Next
Next

How to design a good holiday and vacation parenting plan